Extradition from Thailand to Myanmar

Overview of Thailand–Myanmar Extradition

Thailand and Myanmar do not have a bilateral extradition treaty in place. Despite the absence of a formal treaty, extradition requests between the two countries may still be processed through reciprocity arrangements under Thailand’s domestic legislation.

The legal framework governing extradition from Thailand is primarily established by the Extradition Act B.E. 2551 (2008), which allows for extradition even without a treaty based on reciprocity principles. All extradition requests are processed through Thailand’s Central Authority, which is the Office of the Attorney General.

Key principles that apply to Thailand-Myanmar extradition cases include the requirement of double criminality (the offense must be punishable by at least one year imprisonment in both countries), the rule of specialty (limiting prosecution to specified charges), and the political offense exception. Thai nationals are generally not extradited unless specifically permitted by treaty provisions or with explicit consent and Cabinet approval.

Myanmar’s extradition procedures are governed by its domestic laws, including provisions within the country’s criminal procedure codes and international cooperation frameworks.

Does Thailand Have an Extradition Treaty with Myanmar?

No, Thailand does not have a bilateral extradition treaty with Myanmar. There is no formal extradition agreement between these two neighboring countries.

Despite the absence of a bilateral treaty, extradition requests between Thailand and Myanmar may still be processed through alternative legal mechanisms. Under Thailand’s Extradition Act B.E. 2551 (2008), extradition can potentially occur on the basis of reciprocity, even without a formal treaty arrangement.

When extradition requests are made, they are processed through Thailand’s Central Authority, which is the Office of the Attorney General. The standard principles of Thai extradition law still apply, including:

• Double criminality requirement (the offense must be punishable by at least one year imprisonment in both countries)
• Rule of specialty (the person can only be prosecuted for the specific crimes mentioned in the extradition request)
• Political offense exception (political crimes are generally not subject to extradition)

Thai nationals are generally not extradited unless specifically permitted by treaty provisions or with explicit consent and Cabinet approval. In cases involving Myanmar, where no bilateral treaty exists, such extraditions would require special governmental consideration.

The lack of a formal extradition treaty means that each request must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, with decisions often influenced by diplomatic relations and the principle of reciprocity between the two nations.

Extradition Process from Thailand to Myanmar

The extradition process between Thailand and Myanmar operates without a bilateral extradition treaty, relying instead on reciprocity principles under Thailand’s Extradition Act B.E. 2551 (2008). This creates a more complex legal framework that requires careful consideration of various factors before any extradition can proceed.

Who Initiates the Request

Extradition requests from Myanmar to Thailand are initiated through Myanmar’s competent judicial or prosecutorial authorities. These requests must be transmitted through diplomatic channels to Thailand’s Central Authority, which is the Office of the Attorney General. The requesting state must provide comprehensive documentation supporting the extradition request, including evidence of the alleged crimes and assurance of reciprocal treatment.

Given the absence of a bilateral treaty, Myanmar must demonstrate that it would grant similar extradition requests from Thailand under comparable circumstances. This reciprocity requirement adds an additional layer of complexity to the initiation process.

Judicial Instances in Thailand

The Thai judicial system handles Myanmar extradition requests through a structured hierarchy:

• Office of the Attorney General: Serves as the Central Authority, conducting initial review and legal assessment of incoming requests
• Criminal Court: Reviews the legal merits of the extradition request, examining evidence and ensuring compliance with Thai law
• Court of Appeals: Handles appeals against lower court decisions regarding extradition orders
• Supreme Court: Serves as the final judicial authority for complex extradition cases involving significant legal questions
• Cabinet: Makes the ultimate political decision on extradition, particularly for Thai nationals or politically sensitive cases

The process requires careful examination of double criminality requirements, ensuring that the alleged offense carries a minimum penalty of one year in both jurisdictions. The rule of specialty and political offense exceptions are also rigorously applied.

Processing Timeframes

Without a bilateral treaty framework, extradition proceedings between Thailand and Myanmar typically involve extended timeframes:

• Initial Review: 30-60 days for the Office of the Attorney General to conduct preliminary assessment
• Court Proceedings: 6-12 months for judicial review, depending on case complexity and evidence requirements
• Appeals Process: Additional 6-18 months if appeals are filed through higher courts
• Cabinet Decision: 2-6 months for final political determination, particularly for sensitive cases
• Total Duration: 12-36 months for complete resolution, significantly longer than treaty-based extraditions

These extended timeframes reflect the additional scrutiny required when operating without established treaty frameworks and the need to ensure reciprocity principles are properly applied.

Extraditable Offenses and Legal Framework

The absence of a bilateral treaty between Thailand and Myanmar creates unique challenges in extradition proceedings. Each case requires individual assessment of reciprocity principles, making legal representation essential for navigating this complex framework. The extended processing times and additional legal hurdles underscore the importance of expert legal guidance throughout the extradition process.

Grounds for Refusal

Thailand maintains several legal grounds for refusing extradition requests from Myanmar, providing important protections for individuals facing potential transfer. Understanding these grounds is crucial for anyone involved in extradition proceedings between these two countries.

Political Offences Exception

One of the most significant grounds for refusal involves political and military offences. Thai law recognizes that individuals should not be extradited for crimes that are primarily political in nature. This protection extends to:

• Acts committed in connection with political movements or opposition activities
• Military-related offences that lack a common criminal element
• Offences arising from political persecution or targeting

The determination of what constitutes a political offence requires careful analysis of the specific circumstances and motivations behind the alleged crime.

Thai Nationality Protection

Thailand generally does not extradite its own nationals unless specific treaty provisions permit such action or Cabinet approval is obtained with the individual’s consent. This protection applies to:

• Thai citizens by birth
• Naturalized Thai citizens
• Individuals holding dual citizenship including Thai nationality

This principle reflects Thailand’s commitment to protecting its citizens from potential injustices in foreign legal systems.

Risk of Death Penalty and Torture

Thai authorities will refuse extradition when there is a substantial risk that the requested person may face:

• Death penalty without adequate assurances from the requesting state
• Torture or inhuman treatment in detention or during legal proceedings
• Persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group

Myanmar’s human rights record and use of capital punishment make these considerations particularly relevant in extradition cases.

Additional Legal Safeguards

Several other grounds may result in refusal of extradition requests:

• Double jeopardy (ne bis in idem): If the person has already been tried and convicted or acquitted for the same offence
• Time limitations: When the alleged offence or potential punishment is time-barred under applicable law
• Insufficient evidence: Failure to meet the double criminality requirement or provide adequate supporting documentation
• Procedural violations: Non-compliance with proper diplomatic channels or treaty requirements

Given that Thailand and Myanmar lack a bilateral extradition treaty, any extradition would need to proceed under reciprocity provisions of Thailand’s Extradition Act B.E. 2551 (2008), which maintains these same protective standards.

These grounds for refusal demonstrate Thailand’s commitment to balancing international cooperation in criminal matters with fundamental human rights protections and due process guarantees.

Notable Cases of Extradition from Thailand to Myanmar

While Thailand and Myanmar do not have a formal bilateral extradition treaty, several high-profile cases in 2025 have demonstrated how extradition requests are processed through reciprocity arrangements under Thailand’s Extradition Act B.E. 2551 (2008). These cases highlight the complex legal framework governing cross-border criminal cooperation between the two nations.

Case 1: International Drug Trafficking Network

In March 2025, Thai authorities extradited a Myanmar national involved in a major methamphetamine trafficking operation spanning both countries. The suspect, arrested in Bangkok’s Khlong Toei district, was wanted by Myanmar authorities for coordinating the smuggling of over 500 kilograms of crystal methamphetamine across the Thai-Myanmar border.

The case proceeded through Thailand’s Central Authority at the Office of the Attorney General, which verified that the charges met the double criminality requirement – drug trafficking carries penalties exceeding one year in both jurisdictions. Myanmar authorities provided assurances that the death penalty would not be sought, addressing one of Thailand’s key concerns for extradition approval.

The extradition was approved after confirming that the offenses were not considered political in nature and that the suspect would be tried only for the specific charges outlined in the request, adhering to the rule of specialty.

Case 2: Cross-Border Cybercrime and Fraud

In August 2025, a significant online fraud case resulted in the extradition of two individuals from Thailand to Myanmar. The suspects operated a sophisticated internet scam targeting victims in both countries, using fake investment platforms to defraud investors of approximately $2.3 million USD.

The Myanmar government’s extradition request detailed charges of fraud, money laundering, and cybercrime – all offenses that carry substantial penalties in both countries. Thai authorities conducted a thorough review to ensure the case met all legal requirements, including verification that the suspects had not been previously tried for the same offenses (ne bis in idem principle).

This case was particularly notable as it involved extensive digital evidence sharing between Thai and Myanmar law enforcement agencies. The extradition was completed within six months of the initial request, demonstrating improved cooperation mechanisms despite the absence of a formal treaty.

Both cases illustrate how Thailand’s legal system carefully balances international cooperation with protection of individual rights, ensuring that extradition requests meet strict legal standards before approval, even when operating under reciprocity arrangements rather than formal treaty obligations.

Alternatives and Legal Defense

When facing extradition from Thailand to Myanmar, individuals have several legal avenues to challenge the request and protect their rights. Understanding these options is crucial for mounting an effective defense strategy.

Appeal Opportunities

The Thai legal system provides multiple levels of appeal for extradition cases. Defendants can challenge extradition orders through:

• Initial Court Review: The Criminal Court examines whether the extradition request meets legal requirements under the Extradition Act B.E. 2551 (2008)
• Appeal Court: Decisions can be appealed to higher courts within specified timeframes
• Supreme Court: Final appeal option for cases involving significant legal questions
• Administrative Review: Challenging procedural aspects through Thailand’s Central Authority (Office of the Attorney General)

Legal Defense Strategies

Experienced legal counsel can employ various defense strategies based on the specific circumstances of each case:

• Challenging Double Criminality: Arguing that the alleged offense is not criminal under Thai law or doesn’t meet the minimum one-year penalty requirement
• Political Offense Exception: Demonstrating that charges are politically motivated rather than based on genuine criminal conduct
• Risk of Persecution: Presenting evidence of potential human rights violations or unfair treatment in Myanmar
• Procedural Defects: Identifying flaws in the extradition request or process
• Time Limitations: Arguing that charges are time-barred under applicable statutes of limitations

Asylum and Protection Options

While Thailand is not a signatory to the 1951 Refugee Convention, individuals may still seek protection through various channels:

• UNHCR Registration: Seeking recognition as a person of concern through the UN High Commissioner for Refugees
• Third Country Resettlement: Exploring opportunities for relocation to countries with formal refugee protection programs
• Diplomatic Intervention: Engaging with embassies or consulates of countries that may provide protection
• International Human Rights Mechanisms: Filing complaints with UN special rapporteurs or human rights bodies

Important Note: Given the absence of a bilateral extradition treaty between Thailand and Myanmar, cases proceed under reciprocity principles, which may provide additional grounds for challenging extradition requests. The political situation in Myanmar since 2021 has also created heightened concerns about fair trial guarantees and human rights protections.