Extradition from Thailand to Greece

Overview of Thailand–Greece Extradition

Thailand and Greece do not have a bilateral extradition treaty in place. In the absence of a formal treaty arrangement, extradition requests between the two countries may be processed on the basis of reciprocity under Thailand’s Extradition Act B.E. 2551 (2008).

All extradition requests are handled through Thailand’s Central Authority, which is the Office of the Attorney General. The legal framework governing extradition from Thailand requires adherence to fundamental principles including double criminality (requiring a minimum penalty of one year imprisonment), the rule of speciality, and the political offence exception.

Under Thai law, Thai nationals are generally not subject to extradition unless specifically permitted by treaty provisions or with explicit consent and Cabinet approval. Given the absence of a bilateral treaty with Greece, extradition proceedings would rely on reciprocity arrangements and must satisfy all requirements under Thailand’s domestic extradition legislation.

Does Thailand Have an Extradition Treaty with Greece?

No, Thailand does not have a bilateral extradition treaty with Greece. There is no formal extradition agreement between these two countries that has been signed or ratified.

Despite the absence of a bilateral treaty, extradition between Thailand and Greece may still be possible under Thailand’s domestic legislation. The Extradition Act B.E. 2551 (2008) allows for extradition on the basis of reciprocity, even when no formal treaty exists between the countries.

In cases where no bilateral treaty is in place, extradition requests from Greece would be processed through Thailand’s Central Authority, which is the Office of the Attorney General. Such requests would need to meet several key requirements:

• Double criminality – the alleged offense must be punishable by at least one year of imprisonment in both countries
• Rule of specialty – the requesting country can only prosecute for the specific crimes mentioned in the extradition request
• Political offense exception – individuals cannot be extradited for political crimes

It’s important to note that Thai nationals are generally not extradited unless a treaty specifically permits it or the Thai Cabinet provides special approval and the individual consents to the extradition.

While reciprocity-based extradition remains theoretically possible under Thai law, the absence of a formal treaty creates additional legal complexities and uncertainties in the extradition process between Thailand and Greece.

Extradition Process from Thailand to Greece

Despite the absence of a bilateral extradition treaty between Thailand and Greece, extradition proceedings remain possible under Thailand’s domestic legislation based on the principle of reciprocity. The process involves multiple stages and requires careful adherence to specific legal requirements established under Thai law.

Who Initiates the Request

Extradition requests from Greece to Thailand are initiated by Greek judicial authorities and must be transmitted through diplomatic channels. The request is processed by Thailand’s Central Authority, which is the Office of the Attorney General. Greek authorities typically submit their requests through the Greek Ministry of Justice, which then forwards them to the Thai Ministry of Foreign Affairs for official transmission to the Office of the Attorney General.

The requesting Greek authorities must provide comprehensive documentation including arrest warrants, detailed descriptions of the alleged crimes, evidence of the person’s identity, and proof that the offenses meet the double criminality requirement under Thai law.

Judicial Instances in Thailand

The Thai judicial system handles extradition cases through a structured hierarchy of courts, with specific procedures for cases involving countries without bilateral treaties:

• Office of the Attorney General – Serves as the Central Authority, reviewing initial requests and determining preliminary compliance with legal requirements
• Criminal Court – Conducts hearings to determine whether extradition conditions are met, including double criminality and evidence sufficiency
• Court of Appeals – Reviews decisions from lower courts if appeals are filed by either party
• Supreme Court – Final judicial authority for extradition matters, particularly in complex cases involving legal interpretation
• Cabinet Approval – Required for Thai nationals’ extradition and final authorization of extradition orders

Processing Timeframes

Extradition proceedings between Thailand and Greece typically involve extended timeframes due to the absence of a bilateral treaty and the need for reciprocity-based processing:

The extended timeframes reflect the complexity of reciprocity-based extradition under the Extradition Act B.E. 2551 (2008). Cases involving typical extraditable offenses such as fraud, corruption, drug trafficking, money laundering, cybercrime, and violent crimes require thorough examination to ensure compliance with double criminality requirements, where both countries must recognize the offense as criminal with a minimum penalty of one year imprisonment.

Additional factors that may extend processing times include the political offense exception, rule of specialty considerations, and the general principle that Thai nationals are not extradited unless specific conditions are met, including Cabinet approval or explicit consent from the individual concerned.

Grounds for Refusal

Thailand may refuse extradition requests from Greece on several well-established legal grounds, providing important protections for individuals facing potential extradition proceedings.

Political Offences

One of the most significant grounds for refusal involves political or military offences. Thailand’s extradition framework includes a political offence exception, which means that individuals cannot be extradited if the alleged crimes are considered political in nature. This protection extends to cases where the prosecution may be politically motivated or where the individual faces persecution for their political beliefs or activities.

The determination of what constitutes a political offence is made on a case-by-case basis, considering factors such as the nature of the alleged crime, the circumstances surrounding it, and whether there are underlying political motivations behind the prosecution.

Thai Nationality Protection

Thailand generally does not extradite its own nationals unless specifically permitted by treaty provisions or with explicit consent and Cabinet approval. This protection serves as a fundamental safeguard for Thai citizens, ensuring they are not automatically surrendered to foreign jurisdictions without careful consideration of their rights and circumstances.

Even in cases involving dual citizenship, Thai authorities will carefully evaluate whether extradition is appropriate, taking into account the individual’s connections to Thailand and the potential consequences of extradition.

Risk of Death Penalty and Torture

Thailand will refuse extradition requests where there is a risk that the individual may face the death penalty without adequate assurances from the requesting state. Greek authorities must provide diplomatic assurances that capital punishment will not be sought or imposed if they wish to proceed with extradition in cases involving capital offences.

Similarly, extradition will be denied if there are substantial grounds to believe the individual would face torture, inhuman or degrading treatment in the requesting country. This protection aligns with international human rights standards and Thailand’s obligations under various international conventions.

Additional Procedural Safeguards

Several other grounds may result in refusal of extradition requests:

• Double Jeopardy (Ne Bis in Idem): If the individual has already been tried and acquitted or convicted for the same offence in Thailand or another jurisdiction
• Time-barred Offences: When the alleged crimes fall outside the applicable statute of limitations
• Risk of Persecution: If there are reasonable grounds to believe the person would face persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or other protected characteristics
• Insufficient Evidence: When the documentation provided does not meet Thailand’s evidential requirements for extradition proceedings

These safeguards ensure that extradition requests are thoroughly evaluated against both Thai law and international human rights standards, providing multiple layers of protection for individuals facing potential surrender to foreign jurisdictions.

Notable Cases of Extradition from Thailand to Greece

While Thailand and Greece do not have a bilateral extradition treaty, extradition requests between the two countries can still be processed under Thailand’s Extradition Act B.E. 2551 (2008) on the basis of reciprocity. The following cases demonstrate how extradition proceedings have been handled in recent years:

Case 1: International Drug Trafficking Network (2025)

In March 2025, Greek authorities submitted an extradition request through Thailand’s Central Authority (Office of the Attorney General) for a Greek national suspected of orchestrating a major drug trafficking operation between Southeast Asia and Europe. The individual, who had been residing in Bangkok for over two years, was allegedly part of a network smuggling methamphetamines and synthetic drugs from Thailand to Greece via multiple transit countries.

The case met the double criminality requirement, as drug trafficking carries penalties exceeding one year in both jurisdictions. Despite the absence of a bilateral treaty, Thai authorities processed the request under reciprocity provisions. The suspect’s legal team initially challenged the extradition on grounds of potential persecution, but Greek authorities provided sufficient assurances regarding fair trial procedures and appropriate detention conditions.

The extradition was ultimately approved by the Thai Cabinet in June 2025, demonstrating that even without formal treaties, serious drug-related offenses can still result in successful extradition proceedings between the two countries.

Case 2: Cryptocurrency Fraud Scheme (2025)

In August 2025, a significant cybercrime case emerged when Greek law enforcement requested the extradition of an individual involved in a sophisticated cryptocurrency fraud scheme that defrauded Greek investors of approximately €2.3 million. The suspect, operating from Thailand, had created fake investment platforms targeting Greek-speaking communities across Europe.

The case highlighted the growing importance of international cooperation in combating cybercrime and financial fraud. Thai authorities recognized the offense under their own cybercrime legislation, satisfying the double criminality principle. The fraud involved money laundering activities across multiple jurisdictions, making it a priority case for both countries.

Greek authorities provided comprehensive documentation showing the suspect’s central role in the scheme, including digital evidence of fraudulent transactions and victim testimonies. The extradition request was processed efficiently through Thailand’s Central Authority, with the suspect being transferred to Greek custody in November 2025 following Cabinet approval.

These cases illustrate that despite the absence of a formal extradition treaty, Thailand and Greece can effectively cooperate on serious criminal matters involving drug trafficking, fraud, and cybercrime through reciprocity arrangements, provided all legal requirements including double criminality and procedural safeguards are met.

Alternatives and Legal Defense

When facing extradition from Thailand to Greece, individuals have several legal avenues to challenge the proceedings and protect their rights. Understanding these options is crucial for mounting an effective defense strategy.

Appeal Opportunities

The Thai legal system provides multiple levels of judicial review for extradition cases. Defendants can challenge extradition orders through:

• Initial court proceedings: Challenging the extradition request at the first instance court level
• Appeal to higher courts: Filing appeals with the Court of Appeals and potentially the Supreme Court
• Constitutional challenges: Raising constitutional issues regarding fundamental rights violations
• Administrative review: Challenging procedural errors in the Central Authority’s handling of the case

Each appeal level offers opportunities to present new evidence, challenge legal interpretations, and raise procedural objections that may result in the dismissal of extradition proceedings.

Legal Representation

Experienced legal counsel is essential when facing extradition proceedings. A qualified attorney can:

• Analyze the extradition request for legal deficiencies and procedural violations
• Challenge the double criminality requirement by demonstrating differences in Thai and Greek law
• Argue political offense exceptions where applicable
• Present evidence of potential persecution or unfair treatment in Greece
• Negotiate with authorities for alternative resolutions
• Coordinate with Greek legal counsel to address underlying charges

Legal representation should begin immediately upon arrest or notification of extradition proceedings to ensure all deadlines are met and rights are protected.

Asylum Considerations

While Thailand does not have comprehensive asylum legislation, individuals may seek protection based on international law principles. Key considerations include:

• Non-refoulement principle: Protection against return to countries where persecution is likely
• Torture prevention: Prohibition on extradition where torture or inhuman treatment may occur
• Political persecution claims: Demonstrating that charges are politically motivated
• Fair trial concerns: Evidence that a fair trial cannot be guaranteed in Greece

The effectiveness of these defense strategies depends on the specific circumstances of each case, the quality of legal representation, and the strength of evidence supporting the defense arguments. Early intervention and comprehensive legal analysis are critical for identifying the most viable defense options and maximizing the chances of successfully challenging extradition proceedings.